My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-06-24 Reg
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-06-24 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2013 9:17:45 AM
Creation date
7/18/2013 9:17:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
6/24/2013
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Carr asked if the numbers presented were the actual and Ms. Charumilind said <br />no, not until the end of the FY13. Ms. Carr stated the report showed revenues <br />exceeding expenditures by $75,000 but the surplus included items authorized by <br />Council but not yet spent in a total amount of $330,000: $80,000 for the <br />Comprehensive Plan, $15,000 for the Civic Plaza Study, $160,000 for home <br />rehabilitation grant, $50,000 for the pension and pay study; and $25,000 each for the <br />Senior Youth Task Force and transportation study. Ms. Carr asked how that was <br />handled since it was approved but not yet spent. <br /> <br />Ms. Charumilind stated the items would not be spent in FY13. She said in late <br />August, there would be a budget amendment submitted for the final number for <br />FY13. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr noted that the Council voted to approve the Comprehensive Plan and the <br />Civic Plaza Study and are policy. <br /> <br />Mr. Walker said with the end of Fiscal Year, June 30, 2013, the projects that would <br />not be completed but the City still intended to proceed with them. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr asked that by not spending that money, there was a surplus of $75,000 but <br />if the projects were completed the City would not have that surplus. <br /> <br />Mr. Walker said the City did not spend the money, so the City still has the money. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert said from the statement just made, the City has stronger sales revenue <br />than anticipated and noted that revenues are projected to exceed the amended <br />budget. He asked the Finance Director Ms. Charumilind if she had a way of knowing <br />ahead of revenue to be received from the State of Missouri, knowing the City would <br />be receiving additional revenue yet from the State. <br /> <br />Ms. Charumilind said the City was not informed ahead of time; the one percent from <br />the sales tax pool came from St. Louis County and the Capital Improvement from <br />Parks and Fire sales tax came from the State. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert noted increased monies came from inspection fees and asked if there <br />were any issues with the employment situation being strained. <br /> <br />Mr. Walker said all of City staff is being very productive. He said if the question was <br />can additional staff be used in some areas, he said the answer would be yes. Mr. <br />Walker said the departments are doing what they can with what they have, within the <br />budget constraint. <br /> <br />Mr. Kraft noted the report goes from 2000 to early projection of 2013. He stated it <br />was an encouraging report. Mr. Kraft said the budgets from 2000 to 2007, five of <br />which had deficits. He said the change was seen in the 2011 budget, which was the <br />first year he came on Council. Mr. Kraft stated before he came on Council the <br />administration then had asked for two sales tax increases, which both had failed. He <br />said the amended budget in 2011 had a 2.4 million dollar deficit. Mr. Kraft noted he <br />had asked the City Manager to cut $300,000 out of the budget so as not to use so <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.