My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/10/94
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
1994
>
01/10/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:48:21 PM
Creation date
2/23/2000 9:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
1/10/1994
SESSIONNUM
1608
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sessicm 1608, Minutes Page 5 <br />Jar~ry 10, 1994 <br /> <br />~he Personnel report for the week ending Jar.~y 8, 1994, was received and <br />ordered filed. <br /> <br />BIT.Lq FOR THIRD RFAD~NG <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8155 - VACATING AND ~ I~E R/6}IT-OF-WAY OF R/EGER~ AVE~TGE <br />~iW~N OLIVE BOULEVARD AND MORGAN AVSNUE ]]q UNIVERSITY CI'IY BUT RESERVING <br /> <br />THE O]fI~'ICE OF THE ST. LOUIS COUNTY ~ OF D~:~:~ 6. <br /> <br />Mr. ~ms moved to ~hle Bill NO. 8155. Mr. Wagner seconded the motion. All <br />voted Aye except Mr. Price, who voted Nay. <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8156 - AMMqDING CMAFrZR 34 MUNICipAL CODE REIAT/]qG TO ZONING, AND <br />ARTICLE IX pRIG TO SPECIAL HISTORIC DIS-iRICTS, BY ~qAcrlNG THEREIN A NEW <br />SECI'IO N TO RR KNOWN AS "SECrlC~ 34-127. HIST~e~IC I~ EST~RT.TSHED" SO AS <br /> <br />Mr. Alfred Henneboehle, 10 S. Broadway, attorney for the Archdiocese (owner <br />of Salo~x~ House), said t_hare have been extensive discussions between the <br />Archdiocese and Historic Preservation C~L~dssic~ in trying to reach a com- <br />promise satisfactory to all. The Archdiocese has no objection to the house <br />being designated an historic landmark; however, it does object to the entire <br />property being named an historic district. He said the bill seemed to have <br />sc~e inconsistencies that should be resolved, and suggested ~ahling it and <br />introducing a new bill after the q"ruups have decided hcw much property will <br />be included as part of the landmark designation. <br /> <br />MS. Mary Henderson Gass, 6304 Westminster, Historic Preservation Cun~l~ssion <br />chair, said she felt the C~,u~ssion and the Archdiocese will be able to reach <br />a mutually satisfactory c~,~.~se on the proposed designation. Ihe Mayor <br />askM if another public hearing is necessary, and Mr. Ollendorff said only if <br />the district boundaries were enlarged. Ma. Gass said she thought the bounda- <br />ries would be smaller, but other building restrictions may be necessary. She <br />said another issue was that the stained glass windows in the chapel which <br />were part of the designation have already been removed. In addition, there <br />are exterior items for which a building permit has been obtained--window re- <br />placement, aluminum soffits, etc.; however, the Archdiocese has agreed not to <br />do those items until an et is ready. and she asked that the Planning <br /> <br />Mr. Price moved that consideration of Bill No. 8156 be postponed. Mr. Wagner <br />seconded the motion. It was noted that language in the bill will be amended <br />as agreed to by all parties. Mayor Majerus asked what assurances could be <br />given that no further actions such as removing the stained glass windows will <br /> <br />Mr. John Wiley, president of Catholic Charities of St. Louis, assured Mayor <br />Majerus that nothing will be removed or no significant char~es made until <br />beth parties cede to an amicable agreepat. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.