My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-11-12 Regular City Council Session
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-11-12 Regular City Council Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2013 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
12/4/2013 6:00:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
11/12/2013
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Roll Call vote was: <br />AYES: <br />Mr. Crow, Mr. Glickert, Ms. Carr, Mr. Kraft and Mayor Pro-tem Mr. <br />Price. <br />NAYS: <br /> none <br /> <br />Bill 9213 carried unanimously and became Ordinance 6944. <br /> <br />N. NEW BUSINESS <br />RESOLUTIONS <br />1. <br />Resolution 2013-18 Fiscal Year 2013-2014 – Budget Amendment #1 <br />Resolution was postponed until the next Council meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />BILLS <br /> Introduced by Mr. Glickert <br />1. BILL 9214 – <br />An ordinance amending the compensation to be paid to City <br />Officials and employees by adding a position classification as shown in <br />Schedule A, from and after its passage, and repealing Ordinance No. 6915. <br /> <br />Bill 9214 had its first reading. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr asked what department the Administrative Support Assistant would be <br />working in. Mr. Walker stated that this position is in the Police Department and <br />previously had been performed by a police officer who has now retired. He <br />stated that the Police Chief has requested that it now be changed to a civilian <br />position, which has no difference in pay and will not increase the number of <br />officers. <br /> <br />O. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION (continued if needed) <br />Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel <br />Ms. Glickert stated that she was disappointed that there had been no presentation <br />on alley sweeping because she had serious doubts that whoever put the report <br />together had ever lived with an alley. She stated that it has been three years or <br />longer since the alleys have been swept and that they now have an accumulation of <br />three years of leaves which is a potential fire hazard, as she recalled a garage <br />being set on fire this way. She stated that the previous administration had swept <br />their alleys twice a month, but if her alley had looked like it does today there would <br />have been a Holocaust. Ms. Glickert requested that the alleys be vacuum swept <br />immediately to get rid of the crisp leaves. She stated that she shares one of the <br />commercial boxes placed in her alley with eight families. This box, which in her <br />opinion contributes to the area’s decadent appearance, also means that she has to <br />pay more for her refuse to be picked up than other single family resident. Ms. <br />Glickert stated that the City has dry waste, single stream and recycling, that equates <br />to refuse being picked up twice a week and charges that are being assessed at <br />different levels. She stated that these inconsistent rates had been addressed by the <br />previous administration and needs to be readdressed. <br /> <br />Ms. Glickert stated that she also had a concern about River Des Peres and the <br />creek behind the community center that needs to be dredged. She stated that there <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.