Laserfiche WebLink
<br />infrastructure and redevelopment. Questions regarding whether the City will need bond <br />issues to cover these things or whether any requirements should be imposed on Wash U as <br />they continue to purchase land, are things which she personally is not equipped to make <br />decisions on. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr stated that in some sense Wash U is generous, but their generosity benefits them, <br />for instance, the sculpture in the park where they pay roughly $400 in-kind. They produce a <br />catalog that features their students, and most of the commissioners reach into their pockets <br />to fund a lot of these projects. The City funds some of these projects and Wash U does not. <br />While Wash U anticipates building a sculpture along Ackert Park that they will pay for and <br />maintain, this also benefits Wash U because of its acquisitions in that part of the park. Ms. <br />Carr stated that the school system is really the big loser here since 61 percent of the City’s <br />taxes go to the school district. And while Wash U does have a collaborative program with the <br />middle school, that collaborative provides Wash U with a laboratory to do the kinds of things <br />that they would not have otherwise. Ms. Carr stated that she certainly wants Wash U at the <br />table, but she wants some other thinkers at the table that will help UCity determine what it is <br />they need and want. <br />Mr. Kraft stated that the idea is to have a commission to discuss these kinds of things and <br />Council is not that commission. So what he is going to suggest is a general outline where <br />each Councilperson would make one appointment; the commission would last for <br />approximately six months and they would generate a report. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch asked Mr. Kraft if he was still suggesting that several Council members get <br />together first to develop this outline? Mr. Kraft stated that he and Ms. Carr could meet on <br />their own time to flush out the framework for the Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Price stated that he does not understand why it would take six months to prepare a <br />resolution. Although it is true that UCity is a sales-tax-pooled City and in theory the more <br />people it has, the more sales tax revenue it should receive, the school district’s revenue is <br />based on personal property taxes. So if you have more and more buildings that are being <br />taken off of the tax roll the school district gets less money. When that happens they come to <br />the public and ask for more money. So you either pay over here or you pay over there. He <br />stated that in his opinion, as the City’s expansion takes place it just makes sense to look at <br />these issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Price then asked Ms. Carr how much time she believed it would take the task force to <br />prepare a Resolution? Ms. Carr stated that her belief is that it would take six to twelve <br />months. She stated that she would like this to not involve staff, because she has often seen <br />staff control the situation. So while this task force can certainly obtain resources from staff, <br />her preference is that staff not be involved. Ms. Carr stated that she would also like two <br />appointees per member, because she thinks that there is a need to hear from different <br />voices. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow stated that he is pleased that Council seems to be moving in the same direction. <br />He stated that he does not think that the City has put too many sunsets on any of its <br />commissions, and something that is as large as this, in his opinion, cannot be completed <br />within six months. Mr. Crow stated that he is okay with establishing a sunset, but believed <br />that the City’s history is such that meetings and commissions of this nature typically take a <br />little bit longer than six months. He stated that it would bother him to put an artificially short <br />timeline on this task force because it may mean that some things might not get done. Mr. <br />Crow stated that based on the attendance that Council has experienced at several of its <br />meetings he would have to agree that each member should be allowed two appointments. <br />However he would be willing to leave the final decision up to his colleagues to bring back to <br />Council. He stated that frankly UCity may not be a sales-tax-pooled City because as <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />