Laserfiche WebLink
<br />considered a contributing building. Mr. Leipziger stated that the project had already been <br />submitted to the National Park Service and the Stated Historic Preservation Office since they <br />were applying for Historic Tax Credits. The Commission members then discussed each building <br />individually. <br /> <br />The Chairperson restated the applicable Zoning Code Sections and stated that the Commission <br />members were to determine whether or not the proposed renovations were compatible with the <br />other buildings and structures within the Historic District. <br /> <br />3.a 726 Interdrive Street <br /> <br />Questions/Comments from Commission members and responses from the applicant included: <br /> <br /> <br />-A question was asked about the reason for the proposed removal of the clay tile parapet caps and <br />replacement with metal caps as shown on the plans. Mr. Leipziger stated they were to be <br />replaced because they were in bad shape; however, only the rear ones would be replaced because <br />of the visibility of the front ones. <br /> <br />-A question was asked about the consistency of the proposed metal caps with the design of the <br />existing clay tile caps. Mr. Leipziger stated it would be a painted material to match the existing <br />parapet caps. He stated the clay tile parapets would be kept in front. <br /> <br />-A question was asked about the transition point from clay tile to metal. Mr. Leipziger stated that <br />it was at the corner. <br /> <br />-It was pointed out that both buildings, 726 and 730 Interdrive Street, faced the courtyard between <br />the buildings and were a mirror image of each other. Mr. Leipziger stated they viewed each <br />building as having two front elevations. He stated that the transition of the parapet caps would <br />be on the alley side of the buildings. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Myers to recommend approval of the proposed renovations to 726 <br />Interdrive Street. The motion was seconded by Ms. Marin and carried unanimously. <br /> <br />3.b. 730 Interdrive Street <br /> <br />Questions/Comments from Commission members and responses from the applicant included: <br /> <br />Mr. Leipziger stated that the exterior changes were exactly the same as 726 Interdrive Street. <br /> <br /> <br />-A question was asked about tax credits and if the National Park Service review process was <br />underway. Mr. Leipziger confirmed that was correct and added that review by the State of <br />Missouri was also underway. <br /> <br />-A question was asked about where they were in the process. Mr. Leipziger stated there were <br />three parts to the process; the first part had been submitted and approved while part two was still <br />under review by the state of Missouri and it would be sent to the Federal Government next week <br />for all six buildings under review. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Ms. Marin to recommend approval of the proposed renovations to 730 <br />Interdrive Street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Guest and carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />tm; šE  <br /> <br />