My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-05-12 Reg
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-05-12 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2014 9:47:01 AM
Creation date
7/7/2014 9:46:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Year
2014
Date
5/12/2014
Council Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Description
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />many of the reason for this resolution were provided by citizen comments from the last <br />Council meeting. Mr. Crow asked his colleagues if the suspensions issued by the City <br />Manager reflect the seriousness of the grievances alleged. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe moved to postpone indefinitely Resolution 2014 - 10, seconded by Mr. Glickert. <br /> <br />Mr. Kraft said he did have some questions about the severity of the punishment but as his <br />colleagues pointed out there is a judicial process. The firefighters have availed themselves of <br />this process with the Civil Service Commission. He noted it would be improper for Council to <br />interfere with the ongoing judicial process and therefore he support postponing this resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow noted that all will see the delay tactics moving forward through-out the evening. He <br />noted that there were members sitting on Council that have said they would like to do <br />something but do not have the votes necessary. He said postponing indefinitely is not about a <br />judicial process but rather to drag it out as long as they can so it will become moot. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr noted that a motion to postpone indefinitely would kill the resolution. She said it is a <br />no vote without taking a vote so that some can say they did not want to do it. This motion will <br />stretch out and three months will have gone by and maybe some will be back to work or find <br />another position that pays more. Ms. Carr said that everyone who votes to postpone <br />indefinitely is voting no. She said this resolution only says the Council does not approve of <br />the decision that was made. Ms. Carr stated that these are no votes and did not want citizens <br />to think she voted against them. She noted that she supports a fully-staffed fire department <br />and freedom of speech. <br /> <br />Mr. Price stated his concern was when there are five to six people out of the system, costing <br />for overtime to cover the positions that were suspended will take away from other City <br />services. He asked what the cost was for covering vacant positions and how it affects <br />budgetary process moving forward. City Manager Lehman Walker said the information was <br />not readily available but would provide it to Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch noted to Council that every member has two turns to speak. Mr. Kraft called a <br />point of order noting no one speaks on a motion to postpone. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow stated Council can appeal the rule to let the residents speak. He said because you <br />guy do not have the courage to take the vote and a parliamentary game was being played. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch asked that all residents speak on all five resolutions at once. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert asked to verify that all the resolutions are enveloped into one for speakers to <br />speak on. <br /> <br />CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Gerjuanda Cochren, 6531 Bartmer <br />Ms. Cochren also spoke for her mother and father. She said her firefighters have saved her <br />house from burning down. They cut her out of a truck at Canton and Hanley. They carried <br />her disabled mother and father down steps when they needed to leave the building. She was <br />present because she believed the firefighters do a wonderful job. Ms. Cochren said she did <br />not want the firefighters to fear losing their job when a photo is taken of them with her child. <br />She thanked all the firefighters. <br /> <br />Lisa Hummel, 7575 Stanford Ave. <br />Ms. Hummel state that the six people, who put their lives on line for the City and denied a <br />paycheck because they dared to express an opinion. She said the law governs what the city <br />may not do, not what the firefighters may not do. Ms. Hummel said Mr. Walker’s action is <br />vindictive political retribution and nothing to do with any law. <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.