Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"Urban Redevelopment Corporation Law" set forth in Chapter 353, Revised <br />Statutes of Missouri, 2000; and <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY CITY, <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />SECTION ONE. There exists within the City of University City a certain <br />area hereby determined, found and declared as blighted as defined by Section <br />353.020, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 2000, by reason of age, obsolescence, <br />inadequate or outmoded design, or physical deterioration, the above blighted <br />area has become an economic and social liability, by reason of which such <br />conditions are conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, crime or inability to <br />pay reasonable taxes; the area to be known as the Cates Avenue <br />Redevelopment Area, and being described as follows: A tract of land located in <br />the City of University City, Missouri, being a portion of Cates Avenue and <br />specifically described upon Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein <br />by this reference. <br /> <br />SECTION TWO. The redevelopment of the Blighted Area, as provided by <br />Chapter 353, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 2000, is hereby determined, found, <br />and declared under said Chapter 353 to be necessary and in the public interest <br />under Chapter 353 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, 2000, as amended, and <br />is further necessary and in the interest of the public health, safety, morals, and <br />general welfare of the people of the City of University City. <br /> <br />SECTION THREE. The sections of this ordinance shall be severable. In <br />the event any section of this ordinance is found by a court of competent <br />jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining sections of this ordinance are valid, <br />unless the court finds the valid Sections of this ordinance are so essentially and <br />inseparably connected with, and so dependent upon, the void sections, that it <br />cannot be presumed that the City Council would have enacted the valid sections <br />without the void ones; or unless the court finds that the valid sections, standing <br />alone, are incomplete and are incapable of being executed in accordance with <br />the legislative intent. If any part of this ordinance regarding the rights of <br />Developer are found invalid or unconstitutional, Developer shall thereafter at its <br />election have the right to be released from any Development Agreement. <br />