Laserfiche WebLink
OLIVE&MIDLAND URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT AREA <br /> UNIVERSITY CITY LAND CLEARANCE FOR REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY <br /> SECTION 2 <br /> QUALIFICATION ANALYSIS <br /> This section of the report analyzes the existing conditions of the Area as they relate to <br /> the definition of a "Blighted Area" in the LCRA Law. This analysis is based on an on-site <br /> investigation of the Area conducted by PGAV professionals on September 24, 2007, and <br /> November 8, 2007. Information for this analysis was gathered through interviews and <br /> information provided by City staff and its consultants; data from University City offices; and <br /> field investigations performed by PGAV staff. PGAV staff also relied upon its extensive <br /> experience, knowledge of the real estate market, and professional expertise in the <br /> preparation of this analysis. Photographs illustrating certain conditions were taken during ' <br /> PGAV's investigation visit to the Area and are incorporated herein as Appendix B. This <br /> report will not reflect changes in conditions or events that have occurred subsequent to <br /> the date of the site visit or publication of this report. <br /> The properties located within the Olive and Midland Urban Renewal Project Area are <br /> also contained within the Olive Boulevard Central Tax Increment Finance District ("TIF <br /> District"). The City found the TIF District to be a "blighted area" under Sections 99.800 <br /> to 99.865 — Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act of the Revised i <br /> Statutes of Missouri (R.S. MO). Within the TIF District, the blighting factors present at <br /> the time the TIF District was established included: unsafe conditions, deterioration of site <br /> improvements, and improper subdivision and obsolete platting. While some of these t' <br /> conditions have been addressed in portions of the TIF District, many of these factors <br /> remain present within the portion of the TIF District that comprises the Area. <br /> T <br /> Plate 3 — Conditions Map in Appendix A provides further description of the blighting g <br /> factors as summarized herein. <br /> A. DEFECTIVE OR INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT <br /> t <br /> The transportation infrastructure (street layout/street grid) within the Area exhibits <br /> defective or inadequate street layout and affects all properties in the Area. The close <br /> proximity of uncontrolled curb cuts along Olive Boulevard is non-conforming with the <br /> recommended access guidelines for a state highway such as Olive Boulevard. The <br /> existing road pattern has been altered over time to accommodate changes in the type <br /> and intensity of land uses resulting in an outmoded road design used in ways that it was <br /> not originally designed to facilitate. Contemporary transportation access management <br /> guidelines encourage safe and even traffic flow by minimizing the amount of access f' <br /> points to main arterial roads. According to MODOT's Access Management Guidelines, <br /> access points (for driveway spacing) to a state highway or primary, urban arterial ' <br /> roadway such as Olive Boulevard should be spaced 440 to 660 feet apart. Currently, <br /> the two access drives that front Olive Boulevard are spaced less than 50 feet apart. <br /> 3 <br /> a <br /> i <br /> The City's Public Works department assisted PGAV in the evaluation of Olive <br /> Boulevard's infrastructure. In a summary memorandum, the Public Works department <br /> 3 <br /> 80759 3 PGAVU RBAN CO N S U LTI N G <br /> 1/08/08 <br /> April 7, 2008 J-1 to 6-25 <br />