Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1807 <br />April 2, 2001 <br /> <br />sales, The proprietor is a long standing University City Loop business with an excellent <br />reputation, The proposal has the support of many neighboring businesses, <br /> <br />Ms. Colquirt moved approval. Mr. Wagner seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Munkel had heard many concems from parents of youngsters getting tattoos or <br />other body art without their parents consent, which he believes is a valid concern. He <br />would like to hear the owner's policy on this. <br /> <br />Mark Andrews, 3652 Connecticut, stated that St. Louis County already has laws in <br />place for this issue and has other laws pending. He follows all of these laws. There is <br />no parental consent, because you must be 18 for tattooing. Laws are pending <br />concerning body pieruing. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendofff stated that they are noted for closely checking ID's. Ms. Colquitt said that <br />she could vouch for that personally, <br /> <br />The motion to approve carried unanimously. <br /> <br />CONDITIONAL USE - 6600 DELMAR (MOVE FROM TABLED STATUS): <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner moved to remove this issue from the table. Mr. Munkel seconded the <br />motion, which carried unanimously. <br /> <br />This permit was tabled at the March 19, 2001 City Council meeting to allow discussion <br />and clarification between the property owner and City staff regarding parking availability <br />and trash receptacle location. The property owner and City Manager have agreed on <br />two alternate trash container locations, both of which will be carefully studied, following <br />which a mutual agreement will be reached. This condition may therefore be changed to <br />indicate that the applicant must utilize the trash receptacles made available by the <br />property owner at locations agreed to by the owner and the City. Either of the plans <br />being studied will be a major improvement over the current situation. The property <br />owner has also offered to pay a portion of the cost to beautify the alternate location. <br />Regarding the City's parking requirements, the owner of this property strongly <br />disagrees with the City's attempts to control his private property. In the interest of <br />reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement, however, the owner of the property <br />voluntarily decided to allow tenants to let their customers and employees park on <br />spaces leased by the tenants if they desire to do so during open hours up during <br />operating hours for now and is open to future discussion as cimumstances change. <br />The condition might be reworded to state applicant shall make their two spaces <br />available during their normal business hours for customers. The reworded condition will <br />go partway towards assuring that the intent of the zoning ordinance is followed at least <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />