My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/02/01
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2001
>
04/02/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:48:59 PM
Creation date
5/1/2001 5:17:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
4/2/2001
SESSIONNUM
1807
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Session 1807 <br />April 212001 <br /> <br />CiTiZEN COMMENTS: <br /> <br />Ted White, 6924 Bartmer, brought by several addresses where residents were dumping <br />trash, fixing cars, and storing many vehicles. She stated that these were an eyesore <br />and asked that the City look into them. Addresses were given to the City Clerk to give <br />to the City Manager after the meeting, <br /> <br />Arthur Carter, 1127 Bumh, stated that he was here to address the apparently done deal <br />regarding the construction of a White Castle on Olive St. Rd. He does not understand <br />the procedures are in regards to notifying residents, but he certainly did not receive a <br />notice. He would have liked to have had some input into this. He is opposed to this, <br />but not sure he can do anything about it at this point. <br /> <br />Pat Hatchett, 1131 Bumh, stated that she has been a U. City resident since 1967, She <br />wants to go on record to being opposed to a 24 hour White Castle that backs up to her <br />block. She is on a cul-de-sac and they have a nice retired community, She knows from <br />experience that White Castle is a hangout for young people and this will be an <br />annoyance for the residents. She does not understand why at least 31 residents were <br />not notified about this White Castle. These people disapprove of the White Castle. The <br />Wilson Subdivision would have liked to have had some say in the operation and <br />construction stipulations, She filed the petition list with the City Clerk. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said that the notices did not go to the entire block. They went to the <br />seven nearest homes on Burch. He read off the addresses that were sent notices on <br />Burch, Mayor Adams replied that the law states, in how many feet, the residents that <br />should be notified. Signs are also posted within the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Marco Thompson, 1131 Bumh, stated that he was aware of the White Castle <br />construction, because he in construction work, but he had no idea it was to be erected <br />5 mile from his house, He does not understand why people can only be notified within <br />180 feet. They will be affected by light, smells and noises where they are situated, so <br />why were they not notified. He stated that he did not see the signs that were <br />supposedly posted. He does not think the notification process is right. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendofff stated that the City Council put several conditions on this permit to <br />protect neighbors. He will send copies of the conditions to them. He suggested that <br />they watch for these conditions to be adhered to and if they aren't, to call him and they <br />would be issued violations. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt stated that a police substation would be on the lot and an 8' fence would <br />be installed, which should help alleviate many of the residents worries. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.