11/06/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sessio~ 1506, M~utes Page 3 November 6, 1989 Budget allocation for this project is $29,000. It was recc~,~nded t_hat the bid of $29,925 fz~ T & L Tree Service, Inc. be accepted. Cons~d-ration of Bids for Polioe UD/foi~T~ (#7). Invitations to bid on esti- mated police uniform requii~nta for the remainder of the 1989-90 fiscal year were sent to four local suppliers. Ve_ndors were asked to submit firm prices on all clothing and leather goods on ~ "as needed" basis. The response was as follows: Universal Uniform $11,051.45 Law E~forc~nent Equipment (woman- 11,165.12 owned) (no bid on two items) The toe~] for Law Enforcement Equipment represents their minimum bid. For es- timated requirements of oversize items, the co~any submitted a range of pric- es, with their maximum bid being $11,1380.74. Therefore, it was recu~u,~nded that the bid of $11,051.45 from Universal Uniform be accepted. Mr. luna,s moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Mr. schoomer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. I~JBLIC HEARING - PROPERTY VACATION, OLD BON~C~E AT GANNON The city Manager said a public hearing was set for 7:30 p.m. to hear and con- sider ccm~nt~ on the vacating of a small vacant triangle of City-owned prop- erty measuring 64' by 70' by 90' at the northwest corner of Old Bonhomme and Gannon. Vacating would allow the adjacent property owner to the west to use the property, and the property owner to the north has no objection to this. Mayor Majerus opened the public heari~ at 7:37 p.m. There were no requests to speak, and the Mayor closed the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Mrs. Sch~nan asked that a bill be prepared to carry out this vacation. SI'f~ PLAN - 7732 BLACKBERRY The city Manager reco~,,~nded that the site plan for a second-story addition to the home at 7732 Blackberry. not be approved at this time. He said the appli- cant should be advised to d]ange the plan in accordance with staff recommenda- tions or some other way that may be fo~d to minimize the visual impact of the addition being out of line with other homes on this street. He recommended that the application be tabled until such time as it is revised. He pointed out there %~s no objection to an addition, only to the manner in which it is planned. Ms. Polly Downs, owner of 7732 Blackbe_rTy, said there were several homes in her neighborhood with the type of addition she was planning, and she distrib- uted photographs to the Council which s~%e said showed t]~is. Mr. Adams asked Mr. Goldman, Director of Planning, to explain the modifica- tions the Planning Department was sugg~;ting. Mr. Goldman said the Ms. Downs' drawing shows an addition at the l~_ar of the house, but the addition is higher than the ridge line of the roof ar~ it presents a vertical facade above the ridge of the roof. The staff suggestion is that the pitch of the front lk~rt