10/16/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1505, Minutes October 16, 1989 '~ne City Manager rec~t~nded setting a pUblj November 6, 1989 to hear and cor,~ider c~,m~n~ buildmhle triangle of City-owned pzu~erty (~ corner of Old Bonhomie and Gannon. qbe p~ that the prc~erty should be %~acated to one o~ Mr. A~ams moved that the public hear~ be seconded the motion, which carried unandmousl S£T~: PIAN - 969 MIDLAND The City Manager recu~,a~nded denial of the s~ the c~,ut~rcial bu/lding at 969 Midland,. He able since the lot is too small, without adE main thoroughfare. The applicant, Mr. Hyman }{. Kay, 12 Birna%a the Midland property for five years a~l has since one of the former store tenants used purposes, Mr. Kay decided to install a s~s make other improvements. He felt the man ~ strum tal in preventing vandalism, since ~ city required him to move out. Mr. Kay sai~ will up~L~de, rather than detract frc~, the Responding to Mr. Price, Mr. Kay said the ~z merit had been there for about nine months ~ The front of the building has a barbershop ~ proposed tenant, and there is also a beauty In response to Mrs. Thu~,~c~on, }~. Oll~dorf mercial and cannot be used for a reside.rice w the property is 5000 s~,m~e feet, that incl~ the building. Mr. Kay said he did not u~ would need a yard since he will be in ~he ap Mr. ~mms pointed out that allowing ~uct of for a residence would set a precedent %~ich later on. Mr. Price asked if the property would ihave to use the property in that manner. 5k-. 01] Mrs. Th~son said it appeared that the pre for preventing vandalism and keeping %=~ante thought perhaps a solution might be ]~sik still allow this tenant to be on the pI~ert Mr. Schocmer moved denial, with Mrs. ~./~uman Page 5 ~ .hearing at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, '~ on the vacating of a vacant un- ;4' x 70' x 90') at the northwest ~ owners on each side agree the owners. ~t as ~ed. Mr. Schoomer :e plan for a residential unit in said the proposed use is undesir- quate yard area, and located on a ~ds, Olivette, said he has owned done a great deal to improve it. ~ of the building for sleeping 11 apartment in the building and .~o had been staying there was in- [e property was damaged after the what he has done and plans to do who wishes to live in the apal~c- ~en the City ordered him to move. mt is operated by a cousin of the said the property ~as zoned com- .thout Council approval. Although ~es the parking lot in addition to derstand why the proposed tenant ~rtment only occasionally. a c~m~'~rcial building to be used x~ld create a great many problems be rezoned residential in order ~dorff said that was correct. ~sed tenant had been responsible people off the property, and she .e that would avoid rezoning but periodically. seconding the motion.