Great Rivers Greenway Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Methodology The information in this report reflects the number of trips made past the designated point on the trail by cyclists, pedestrians, and those using other methods of transportation. For example, if an individual passes the designated point and then turns around and passes the point again going in the opposite direction, this would count as two trips. Therefore, the information presented does not reflect the number of unique users, but rather the number of trips made past the designated point on the trail. This method for manual counts is the most practical and accurate option. As each trail user passes the counter the mode of transportation, gender, age group (child or adult), and helmet use (if applicable) are noted. Typically, the counter notes if the trail user is travelling in a group of two or more people. Distinguishing between trail users in groups and those just traveling in proximity to one another can be difficult. It was not possible for the counter to record information about groups on the Centennial Greenway because of the high volume of users and the intermittent way users interacted with one another. Manual counts represent a sound method for collecting trail data, but a few drawbacks still exist. It is not feasible to monitor the trail 24 hours a day. Five to seven hour periods are selected to perform the counts based on peak usage observed during previous trail counts. The demographic data collected is valuable, but may not be completely accurate. Determining the age and gender of cyclists in full gear at high speeds can be difficult. It can also be difficult to determine the gender of small children in strollers and child carriers. Lastly, pedestrians might be under-represented in the count because they tend to travel much shorter distances than cyclists and are less likely to be found at any one point along the trail. Trip Counts Figure 2