2004-01-26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1909 January 26, 2004 The request was passed five to two, with Mr. Wagner and Mr. Lieberman voting nay. A,qenda Item #5 - Packaqe Liquor License at 7900 Olive Boulevard An application has been filed by Aldi, Inc., to reactivate their license to sell all types of intoxicating liquor by the package at retail at their full service grocery store. All ordinance requirements are met including prior experience with a clean record and demonstrating good character in the police record check. It appears that this application meets all Council standards and policies for issuing such licenses only to large retail establishments where alcoholic beverage sales would not be the primary activity. Ms. Welsch moved to approve this request and Ms. Colquitt seconded the motion. Ms. Colquitt asked why Aldi's sought to re-activate a liquor license, and was advised they had held one before, a number of years before. According to information from the Finance Department they held one, but allowed it to lapse, by not renewing it. Mr. Wagner raised a point that at one time the City Council had determined to limit the number of full liquor licenses available in University City, and asked for someone to provide details to refresh his recollection. Mayor Adams said the City Council had decided to limit the number of full-package liquor stores in University City to two in number, but they did not include grocery stores in this limit. He said when stores request such licenses; their actual physical dimensions are taken into consideration for them to be able to request one. Mr. Sharpe said that he was in favour of granting a liquor license to Aldi's, but he questioned why another individual met with so much resistance when he tried to apply for a liquor license. Mayor Adams suggested that it was easier for Aldi's to reinstate their license because they held one successfully before. He said the City Council sought to establish that the liquor license was applied to a business which did exactly what it claimed to do, and not something else. Ms. Welsch said, for the record, that she would vote in favor of this measure because it is a re-activation and because she espouses not giving one store competitive advantage over another. Mr. Lieberman asked if Aldi's intent was to obtain a full-liquor license "by the package" for their current store and if they planned to transfer it to their new store and Mr. Ollendorff responded that this application was for the existing store and did not mention the new store. He is not aware of their intentions for the new store. Mr. Lieberman then pointed out that the ordinance governing liquor stipulated that it must be placed in a distinguishably separate location from the food section. He asked if Aldi's planned to do this, and was advised that no site plan had been submitted for consideration. Mayor Adams suggested that the original site-plan submitted for the original license would probably be re-activated. Mr. Wagner said the ordinance does have a floor-space limitation and asked if that information was known? Mr. Ollendorff said they could not violate the ordinance; it is not asked on the application if they intend to comply. Mayor Adams said they would have to stipulate the space in the site plan, and Mr. Wagner asked Mr. Ollendorff to check this matter in the site plan, which he Page 8