My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-05-17 Special
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2004
>
2004-05-17 Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:50:13 PM
Creation date
6/29/2004 8:47:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
5/17/2004
SESSIONNUM
1921
TYPE
SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Session 1921 <br />May 17, 2004 <br /> <br />13. Personnel Issues - $32,000 was decided upon to delete from suggested <br />salary increases. The savings realized here can be utilized elsewhere at <br />Council's pleasure. <br /> <br />14. Recreation Facility- there is money in the budget for new programs. Next <br />spring, new programs will be developed to match the completion of the new <br />facility. The cost could be $50,000 to $100,000, which would be off-set by at <br />least $25,000 in new revenues, but none of that is clear at this point. There is <br />not enough detail to determine exact budget now. The amount budgeted is <br />$24,000 for next spring's new programs at the recreational facility, which is over <br />and above what is spent currently. <br /> <br />15. Recreation Division - program upgrades include: 1) $10,000 for specific <br />programs, and $10,000 undesignated. There is $34,000 in the budget for next <br />year's needs, but those needs could be substantially more. Savings in the <br />budget elsewhere could be transferred to this line. For the recreation facility <br />there is $12,000 for full-time personnel and $12,000 for part-time personnel. In <br />the Recreation Division program the $20,750 is in Miscellaneous Services. <br />Most of the needed funds could be off-set by fees, which may come in during <br />August or September. There was discussion about how to pay for needed staff; <br />two full-time positions are envisioned. Mr. Ollendorff said the $32,000 that <br />Council cut from salaries could be transferred for this need and allocated to the <br />upgrade; and the next item on this list, $8,000 for demolitions, could also be <br />transferred. When the City does the work, it charges the costs to a revolving <br />fund. A high percentage is returned. Mr. Wagner said this would amount to "an <br />accounting trick." The Revolving Fund can be used instead of the General <br />Fund, which currently has $400,000 in assets. Ms. Brungardt asked Mr. <br />Ollendorff what he would have done if the $32,000, from the salary cuts, were <br />not there, and he said he would have looked elsewhere in the budget to find the <br />needed money. <br /> <br />16. Parking Garage Revenue -is a separate, revolving fund, so the revenue <br />does not contribute to the General Fund. The report on the status shows that <br />revenue is down over the past few years, probably in tandem with the business <br />cycle. The amount over which the City has control is the money which is put <br />into the meters and the issuing of parking tickets. Parking meter revenue is <br />down, slightly. Discussion followed about parking spaces and stolen cars in the <br />Loop. <br /> <br />17. Money for recreation improvement comes from future fee increases and this <br />issue is indirectly related to non-resident access. A study session has been <br />suggested to discuss matters relating to this topic and the information is in the <br />report from the City Manager. Mr. Ollendorff said that new residents have <br />received free pool passes for many years. There are many issues for the City <br />Council to consider relating to this topic. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.