My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
June 25, 1979
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
1979
>
June 25, 1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:50:22 PM
Creation date
11/22/2004 3:02:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
6/25/1979
SESSIONNUM
1223
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Session 1223, Minutes <br />June 25, 1979 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />PERSONNEL REPORT <br /> <br />The Personnel report for the week ending June 23, 1979, was received and ordered <br />filed. <br /> <br />POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />The Police Department report for the week of June 10, 1979, through June 16, 1979, <br />was received and ordered filed. <br /> <br />FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />The Fire Department report for the week of June 17, 1979, through June 23, 1979, was <br />received and ordered filed. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF PENSION BILLS AND SETTING OF TAX RATES <br /> <br />The Council decided, before the reading of any bills, to discuss the merits of the <br />various bills having to do with the pension fund, specifically whether the fund <br />should be at 29¢ or go to 32¢. Councilman Adams said he was very disappointed that <br />the media did not cover the discussion on pensions at the last Council meeting, since <br />he feels it is an extremely important topic at present, having great impact on the <br />fiscal viability of the City now and in the future. Mr. Adams said he was in favor <br />of using the 29¢ figure for the pension fund, rather than going to 32¢, for a great <br />many reasons. In order to make his position clear, he stated that in August, 1978, <br />Missouri voters passed Constitutional Amendment #4, submitted by the 79th General <br />Assembly~ which "requires preparation of statement of costs for public inspection by <br />qualified actuary as provided by law before final action may be taken to change sub- <br />stantially any retirement benefits for public officials and employees." Also, in <br />August, 1978, the citizens of University City voted on this issue, and vote being <br />6,238 Yes and 2,186 No. In other words, Mr. Adams feels University City citizens <br />want their legislators to look at pension plans very carefully before making any <br />changes. In the 80th General Assembly, H. B. 130 was passed which puts forth a pro- <br />gram and even asks questions of actuaries before a pension plan can be changed. He <br />emphasized that the pension plan must be actuarily sound so that when employees are <br />ready to retire, there will be money in the pension fund on which they may retire. <br />Mr. Adams said that when the citizens of University City voted in 1976 a maximum <br />rate of up to 40¢ for the pension fund, that rate was to maintain the fund and not <br />necessarily improve it. He asked that the pension board rethink its position, look <br />at other alternatives, and come up with a different proposal. He feels some small <br />changes may be in order, but the changes recommended now are too drastic. Council- <br />man Adams moved that the funding for the retirement system for the fiscal year <br />1979-80 be 29¢. <br /> <br />Councilman Kelley reviewed briefly the proposal for the pension plan as recommended <br />by the Pension Board of the Uniformed Employees, and stated that the revisions which <br />were made will correct some inequities which existed in the old plan. He also said <br />that it is estimated that the rate which is reco-,,ended, 32¢, will result in reach- <br />ing the limit of 40¢ only one year earlier than the present plan. He feels that the <br />report from the actuaries is actuarily sound. <br /> <br />Mr. Ellman said, for the record, he wanted to correct some inaccurate information <br />which had been given to the Council. He said that the present plan provides that <br />retirement can be gained at the age of 50 with 20 or more years of service at 37½% <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.