Laserfiche WebLink
Session 868, Minutes <br />June 19, 1967 <br /> <br />Page 2~ <br /> <br />letter and Mr. Frank obtained for him a copy of the letter, dated ~y 12, <br />1967, signed by John J. Hamilton, Jr., President of the Board of Trustees <br />and the letter is addressed to Honorable Nathan B. Kaufman, Mayor, and to <br />Councilmen, City of University City, ~.~ssouri and begins, "Dear Mayor <br />Kaufman and Councilmen.." and sets out what their problem is. <br /> <br />Councilman Bamburg said he assumed that Mayor Kaufman received the letter <br />and he asked whether that is correct. The }~yor said he thinks Council- <br />man Bamburg called the communication to his attention during an executive <br />session, and he explained that as he recollects, he turned it over to <br />City Manager Henry and as a result of that communication (which may have <br />unfortunately never reached members of the Council) the Council did have <br />a meeting with the Library Board (which he believes Councilman Bamburg <br />was unable to attend) and he asked what the point is that Councilman Bam- <br />burg is making. <br /> <br />Councilman Bamburg said the point is that when the Mayor receives com- <br />munications in his official capacity they are only in his official <br />capacity as Mayor and any communications addressed to him, which have to <br />do with matters of substance, are addressed really to all members of the <br />Council - any letters which are addressed to the Mayor and Councilmen <br />ought to get to the Council. He said he had specifically requested that <br />the letter from the Library Board be addressed to the Mayor and members <br />of the Council. <br /> <br />Councilman Bamburg said he is going to suggest that when letters come to <br />the City Hall, unless they are marked to the Mayor personally, that the <br />City Clerk open these letters and distribute them to the members of the <br />Council, and Councilman Bamburg moved accordingly. <br /> <br />Councilman Bamburg said the reference he made is one instance that he <br />knows of, but has no idea how many other communications should be brought <br />to the Council's attention and aren't because the Council doesn't get <br />them. <br /> <br />~yor Kaufman took exception to Councilman Bamburg's remarks and said he <br />takes this criticism as an insult. He pointed out that he comes into <br />City Hall practically every morning and attends to business and has <br />opened letters for any number of years - the Council has received all <br />communications and this may have been one which may not have been trans- <br />mitted to members of the Council. He added he would consider it an in- <br />sult if Councilman Bamburg's motion were to be passed by members of this <br />Council. <br /> <br />Councilman Bamburg said he makes the motion, and stated that he is no <br />more directly affected than other members of the Council except that he <br />was trying to do his job as a representative to the Library Board in <br />setting this up for the very purpose for which this letter was written, <br />and then the Council didn't receive it. He said that incidentally there <br />were further complaints about the fact that the school attorney and the <br />city attorney weren't able to get together and that was the reason for <br />that executive session, so perhaps if the Council had received a copy of <br />the letter they would have been able to talk to members of the School <br />Board and directed that the attorneys for the respective bodies get together , <br /> <br /> <br />