Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1939 <br />November 15, 2004 <br /> <br />the identification of events, public announcements, and the provision to allow lights to <br />fade gently. Mr. Wagner seconded the amendment. Ms. Calquitt asked what the <br />difference was between "fading lights" and "gently fading lights" and was advised that <br />the ordinance does not allow blinking or changing lights. The proposed marquee will <br />include fading lights, giving the appearance of movement, which is a stretching of the <br />ordinance and, therefore, he had recommended a condition that there be no fading <br />lights. He further explained that the motion on the floor deleted that condition. If the <br />motion passes, then fading lights would be allowed as requested. Mayor Adams added <br />that "historically" the City forbade blinking or moving signs. Mr. Wagner said when he <br />heard it described it sounded quite attractive and tasteful. Ms. Welsch agreed with Mr. <br />Wagner and Ms. Brat. Ms. Welsch said he attended the Plan Commission meeting <br />when this item was discussed. The Plan Commission discussed the concerns with the <br />fading lights and determined it would not pose a hazard to drivers and would be similar <br />to the sign for the Pinup Bowl down the street and she thinks it would add favorably to <br />the environment of the Loop. <br /> <br />Joe Edwards, 6504 Delmar Boulevard, the applicant for the sign, answering a question <br />from Ms. Brat, advised that this sign would be designed by the same designers that <br />designed the sign on the Pinup Bowl. This is the first time the sign would be in full color. <br /> <br />The amendment to the motion passed unanimously. Mayor Adams called the question <br />on the original motion and the Council approved unanimously. <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit Request from Aldi Store: <br /> <br />The City Manager announced another recommendation from the Plan Commission to <br />approve a new Aldi's store at the corner of North and South Road and Olive Boulevard. <br />He concurs that the permit should be approved. The plan appears to be well thought <br />out and meets the City's requirements as long as the conditions recommended are <br />adhered to: 1) applicant provide a detailed drainage plan, a grating plan and a <br />landscape plan; 2) developer submit plans for construction parking and for construction <br />traffic; 3) lighting installation complies with ordinance requirements; 4) all construction <br />conforms with approved plans, including the plans for ingress, egress, mass and height <br />of the buildings; 5) condition that all mechanical and electrical equipment be screened; <br />and 6) condition that trash and containers be appropriately placed and emptied during <br />daytime hours. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff reported two additional conditions to which the applicant has agreed in <br />principle: 1) the plan when installed must include safely-marked pedestrian access to <br />the store from both North and South Road and from Olive Boulevard, and 2) all <br />standard infrastructure improvements modeled after those currently being installed on <br />Olive Boulevard, be extended to the North and South and Olive Boulevard frontage of <br />this development. He recommended approval of the plan with all of these conditions <br />because it will add convenience for shoppers, add visitors to the community, improve <br /> Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />