08/17/1992 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1576, Minutes August 17, 1992 Page 7 Plannin;J for review am approval prior to p.1rdlase of materials. 7. Flood plain activities am stann water detention needs shall be reviewed am approved by the Director of Public Works. 8. Electric am gas meters shall be located at the rear of the building am no ovem.ead electric or camm.mi.cation lines shall be located over the areas directly north, south, or east of the building. '!he City Manager said the project is similar in scope, but slightly smaller than a previously approved site plan. Mrs. Schuman lTOVed approval with all corrlitions. Mr. Wagner secorrled the IW- tion, which carried unaniIoously. PATIO DINING SITE PIAN - 7828 OLIVE '!he city Manager said at the last meetirg council directed that the staff am applicant work out plans for an outdCX)r dinin;J area for Hadley's Restaurant, 7828 Olive. A general plan was subnitted, but it is not detailed enough to allow for analysis, therefore, it was rec:::cmnerrled that this matter be held over and the applicant encouraged to subnit IOOre detailed plans. '!he applicant, Ms. Millie washin;Jton, 7828 Olive, said she thought she sub- mitted what the City wanted. Mr. Ollerrlorff said the City received only a drawirg showirg where the deck was to be located, but a description of the construction of the deck, height, materials, etc., was needed. Mayor Majerus suggested that Ms. Washington meet again with Director of Plannirg Al Goldman and ask him to list everyt:hi.rg that should be included in the plan. Mr. Adams asked Ms. washin;Jton to be sure that harrlicapped parkirg am access is shown on the revised plan. In response to Mr. Price, Mr. Goldman said Ms. washington brought in a sketch early last week and was informed that IOOre infomation was needed: a sketch done by the Plannin;J Department that included needed infomation was given to her. She was told that if she came back with a detailed plan by '!hursclay, it could be put on the agerrla for this meetirg, although nomally there is a deadline of a week. He met with Ms. Washi.rqton Friday to examine the plan, but it was still lackin;J in many necessary details. Mrs. '!ho.rrpson asked why this matter was on the agerrla if the plan cannot be voted on. Mr. Ollerrlorff said all deadlines were waived .in order to accammo- date Ms. washington: when the detennination was made that the plan was not acceptable, he put the matter on the agerrla anyway so it could be discussed. Mr. Price said the July 27 minutes do not specify that IOOre detail was asked for. However, Mr. Adams said even though not reported in the minutes, Ms. Washirgton was told a detailed drawirg was needed, anj there were still many questions that had to be answered. If considered now, he would have to vote no: he also had very serious reserro.tions about havirg a dinirg patio exterrl- irg into the parkirg lot in front of the restaurant. Mrs. Schuman, notirg the lot is quite full durirg the day, was concerned that