03/16/1992 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1565, Minutes March 16, 1992 Page 7 used rather than the Plan Camnission rec:x:mnerxBtions. His list of suggested changes was circulated earlier, but Mr. Wagner felt that tryiDJ to m:xtify the conditions was beyom council's scope am it might be wise to table. Mayor Pro Tern Adams agreed that if najor rewritiDJ was necessary, the natter should be postponed. Mrs. '!harpson had several concems~sposition of the present synagogue, potential sewer prOOlems, am property values. Mr. Adams said the fate of the present synagogue is not gennane to the discussion. Mr. Goldman said the sewer relocation will be done urrler MSD stan::1ards am he did not feel there would be a prOOlem. Mr. Price asked about the transitional yard, am Mr. Goldman said while the ZoniD1 Code requires 15 feet, this plan had a transitional yard of nine feet at the property rear, with the buildin;J line 25 feet fran the property line, while the Code asks for 30 feet. Mr. Price asked about the trees, am Mr. Goldman said there were two century oaks and one of the conditions was ained at saviDJ them. Mr. Price wished to know the largest mnnber of people likely to be on the site at one time, and Mr. Ziln- balist said it would be a special occasion such as a bar mitzvah that might draw as many as 250 people, however, guests will not be driviDJ a car. '!here was discussion about how to proceed, am it was decided that each con- dition rec::ammerrled by Mr. Goldman, along with Mr. Schoamer's suggested m:xti- fications, will be examined in turn. Mayor Pro Tern Adams asked for a notion. Mr. Schoamer m:::wed approval of the conditional use pennit as outlined in the memorarrlum of March 11 from Mr. Goldman to the city Manager. Mr. Wagner sec- onded the lTOtion, and suggested that any changes to conditions be offered as amerxhnents. All agreed. '!he chair ruled that each condition will be read in turn, debated, am nay be voted on individually. 1. SUbmit a co.nplete site plan for review and approval of the the City Coun- cil arnjor staff showiDJ existiDJ and relocated easements, existiDJ am relo- cated utility locations, curt> cuts, walks, parking, drives, signs, lightiDJ, fenciDJ, handicapped access ranp;, landscaped areas, trash facilities, exter- ior mechanical equipnent am finished grades. Final developnent shall be in- stalled am naintained in substantial confo:rmance with the approved site plan Provide cross sections of site and buildin;J to show slopes and gradin;J, espe- cially of drives, walks and screen fenciDJ. Include info:rmation on stonn wa- ter disposal and protection fran water nm-off, am soil erosion duriDJ con- struction period. Also provide info:rmation to denonstrate that exterior lightiDJ will be properly shaded to avoid direct light on adjoiniD1 residen- tial premises. Mr. Schoamer m:::wed approval with no changes. Mrs. Schmnan secorrled the ITO- tion, which carried unaniJoously. 2. SUbmit co.nplete elevation drawings of the buildin;J for review am approv- al of the City council arnjor staff. Show height, roof lines, naterials, ar- chitectural treatment and relationship to adjoiniD1 residential stnlctures. 'Ihe design, naterials and colors shall co.nplement am blem with the sur- rourm.ng residential appearance. FollowiDJ discussion, Mr. Schoamer m:::wed that "shall" be changed to "should." Mr. Wagner secomed the notion, am all voted Aye except Mr. Price, who voted Nay.