Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular meeting <br />January 30, 2006 <br /> <br />Parks Commission, worked with the Council and more importantly worked with all of the <br />citizens of University City. We would like to show our gratitude for their great dedication <br />and work. They showed what this city is all about. They are its heart and all of its soul. <br />Certificates, signed by all members of the Council, were presented to all who had <br />worked on the Prop K. committee. Cheryl Thompson, Ken Michaels , Elsie Glickert, <br />Dorothy Ely, Ron L, Alan Rosenkoetter, Jay Burnstein, Jen Jensen, Henry Ferry, Bob <br />Winters, Kevin Turney, Ken McHale, Pamela Mason Carter, Karen StClair, AI Ross, <br />Emmett Moore, Jennifer McCre, Ray Raykamp, Mary Hart. Applause was given for the <br />Prop K committee. Mayor Adams encouraged everyone to go visit the Centennial <br />Commons. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch wanted to thank the Prop K commission. She was very pleased with the <br />establishment with such a commission; this was one of her first recommendations to the <br />Council when she became a Council member. She was proud of the way the Centennial <br />Commons has turn out and encouraged everyone to go over and see it. <br /> <br />RESOLUTIONS: <br /> <br />164/40 Big Bend and Bellevue interchanges <br />MoDOT removed the full Big Bend interchange in the original plans. University City <br />wants to express their concern over eliminating that full exchange. Ms. Welsch made a <br />motion for approval and was seconded by Ms. Colquitt. It was unanimously accepted <br />by voice votes of all AYES. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner requested that we go to the Legislative docket of bill number 8838 because <br />of the large number of citizens present for this bill. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner explained that the issue in this bill was whether the Council should approve <br />an intergovernmental agreement between University City and MetroLink. Mr. Wagner <br />said that by passing the ordinance tonight, Council would be divorcing itself from the <br />agreement put forth by MetroLink. This has to do with the greenspace, south of Ames <br />Place. The issue is who has ownership of this strip of land and what action is going to <br />be involved in the litigation in February between Ames Place and Metro. Mr. Wagner <br />explained that there is a triangle involved: Metro, University City and Ames Place. As <br />Mr. Wagner sees this ordinance, only two sides of the triangle were involved: Metro <br />and University City. Mr. Wagner stated that at the proper time he was going to move to <br />Table this bill and introduce a substitute bill with better language and in particular he felt <br />that University City does not own the greenspace, but rather University City has an <br />interest in this strip of land in the form of an easement. This land in question was the <br />area where streetcars ran until they were discontinued in 1963, at which time University <br />City received a Quit-Claim Deed. What Mr. Wagner perceived was that what University <br />City received was the easement of the transportation and the utility. In February, Metro <br />will be in court with Ames Place negotiating whether Ames Place owns the greenspace <br />Page 2 <br />