Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> _ Session 1319, Minutes Page 5 <br /> November 22, 1982 <br /> <br /> <br /> will be leased to short-term tenants, since it was expected that his group (Design <br /> Build Collaborative, Inc.) will expand enough to eventually use the whole building. <br /> The amount to be leased would be about 4000 square feet, to perhaps three to five <br /> tenants initially. <br /> There was further discussion concerning possible safeguards for ensuring that the <br /> building would have tenants compatible with the neighborhood. Mrs. Metcalfe con- <br /> curred that the Council would not want to review every administrative position; <br /> however, she thought this situation was unique because of the conditions relating <br /> to parking. After more discussion, it was decided that the parameters could not be <br /> too specific because of the possibility of setting a pr_.°edent, and if certain uses <br /> were prohibited, it might be taken to mean that all uses not named would be permis- <br /> sible. Mr. Ollendorff said he thought the administration, if it erred, would err <br /> on the side of being too strict. <br /> Mayor Mooney closed the public hearing at 8:24 p.m. <br /> Mr. Levy moved to grant a conditional use permit to Design Build Collaborative, Inc. <br /> to convert the building at 6900 Delmar into a professional office building, assum- <br /> ing adherence to the four conditions stated above. Mr. Adams seconded the motion, <br /> which carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> TAX ABATEMENT - 6900 DELMAR BOULEVARD <br /> The City Manager said a public hearing was scheduled for 8:00 p.m. for the purpose <br /> of considering the redevelopment plan and tax abatement for the same property at <br /> 6900 Delmar that was discussed in the previous agenda item. Mr. Ollendorff said <br /> that statutes required that certain findings be made before tax abatement could be <br /> considered by the Council. The Plan Commission studied this matter, he said, and <br /> found that the property was eligible for tax abatement. The Council will need to <br /> decide eventually whether or not to grant tax abatement, and if so, to what extent. <br /> He noted that the public hearing was required by law, and following that, he recom- <br /> mended that the decision be tabled for the present. The reason is because financing <br /> and the economies of the project have not yet been determined. He said he and the <br /> Mayor have met with the owner, and until the owner obtained additional information <br /> on financial needs and the financial package, a recommendation could not be made on <br /> the extent of tax abatement. He suggested that any comments received be taken under <br /> advisement, but that a decision should be postponed. <br /> Mr. Adams moved to table this item until the appropriate figures were forthcoming. <br /> Mr. Schoomer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. <br /> REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VACANT BUILDING CONDEMNATION NOTICE <br /> The City Manager recommended that the City Council receive and accept the Universi- <br /> ty City Redevelopment Authority notice concerning condemnation of vacant multi- <br /> family buildings suitable for rehabilitation at 6305, 6409 and 6266 Cates, and 905 <br /> and 924 Eastgate. Following expiration of the prescribed notice period (30 days), <br /> the Redevelopment Authority may seek a developer interested in acquiring the prop- <br /> erty and committing to rehabilitation, and at that point, acquisition procedures <br /> can be undertaken by the Authority, Mr. Ollendorff said. City funds would not be <br /> expended without assurance of recovery. <br />