Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> I <br /> <br /> Session 1317, Minutes Page 4 <br /> October 25; 1982 <br /> { <br /> 1.: <br /> each tenant of the building. Mr. Ollendorff said the conditions could be as speci- <br /> fic as the Plan Commission and Council decided to make them. <br /> 9 Mr. Rubin Schlafman, 747 Yale, asked what was meant by the term "institutional of- <br /> fices" in the resume of proposed changes. Mr. Ollendorff said a description of <br /> that term would be taken from a legal dictionary, but he thought it would be any <br /> type of private or public institution which was eligible to apply. Mr. Schlafman <br /> asked if the proposed changes were being considered because several public build- <br /> ings were for sale, and Mr. Ollendorff said that was correct. He confirmed Mr. <br /> Schlafman's statement that the buildings would go on the tax rolls if they were ap- <br /> proved for office use, while if the buildings were put to non-profit institutional <br /> use, they would most likely be granted tax-exempt status. <br /> Ms Barbara Fraser, 581 Stratford, trustee of University Hills subdivision, asked <br /> what would happen to Hanley Jr. High School (now vacant) if the proposed amendment <br /> was not approved. Mr. Ollendorff said the property would have to be rezoned. If <br /> the amendment passed and the proposed use was for offices, the developer would ap- <br /> ply for a conditional use permit which must be approved, following a public hear- <br /> ing, by both the Plan Commission and the City Council, with the desired conditions <br /> attached. Essentially, the amendment would permit greater control over building <br /> use in the "PA" district than if the property were rezoned. Ms Fraser then asked <br /> whether subdivision indentures took precedence over rulings of the Plan Commission <br /> and City Council. Mr. 011endorff said an attorney who was familiar with the Uni- <br /> versity Hills subdivision indentures should be consulted, who would have to rule <br /> whether the indentures would be legally binding on a future property owner--the <br /> City would not rule on this. The developer may or may not have to abide by the <br /> subdivision indentures, which would remain as strong or as weak as they are now. <br /> Mr. Schoomer said an additional level of protection was afforded subdivisions if <br /> this change was adopted, i.e., if a property should be resold at a later time, it <br /> would again have to go through a public hearing before the Plan Commission, and al- <br /> so come before the Council for approval as a conditional use. If the property were <br /> merely rezoned under present zoning law, a great many activities would be permitted <br /> which would not come before the Council for approval. <br /> Mayor Mooney closed the public hearing at 8:20 p.m. <br /> CONSIDERATION OF BIDS ON PLANT MATERIALS <br /> The City Manager said the City solicited bids for plant materials for the Forestry <br /> Department, with the results listed: <br /> Treeland $13,733.00 <br /> Carl Giebel Landscaping and Nursery 12,580.60 <br /> Frisella Nursery 10,674.00 <br /> Forest Keeling Nursery 10,267.00 <br /> A. Waldbart 8,665.00 <br /> Mr. Ollendorff recommended awarding the bid to Waldbart, adding 46 additional trees <br /> for a total amount of $10,045. The bid price was below estimates, which allows the <br /> purchase of more trees. <br /> <br /> Mrs. Metcalfe said she appreciated the list of trees and planting locations which <br />