1982-10-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1317, Minutes Page 5 October 25, 1982 the Council received from the administration, but she had some grave concerns about this item. Several of the locations with which she was familiar were scheduled to receive trees which did not seem suitable for those locations; for instance, pear trees, which are small and compact, were slated to be planted in areas which had large, wide-.o-pen spaces which should have trees which will become large with spread- ing branches. She thought perhaps the aesthetic goal of the Forestry Department must be quite different than her own and others. Mr. Ollendorff said he could not comment on the tree locations, since he had not examined them in any great detail, nor could he be sure how much urgency there was in approving this, since he knew some of the trees were to be planted this fall and some in the spring. Mayor Mooney suggested that the matter be postponed until the Forestry Department could respond to Mrs. Metcalfe's concerns. He thought perhaps it might be approved conditionally, subject to agreement between Mrs. Metcalfe and Forestry. Mrs. Met- calfe said she did not want a written justification of every tree--she merely was asking for general goals and the reasons for planting small trees where it seemed there should be large trees. Mr. Adams said perhaps the rationale behind the Forestry Department's choice of planting locations may have been the mixing of different types of trees, since that may make them less prone to disease. Also, the mixing of different types may cre- ate pleasant aesthetics in terms of color. Mr. Levy said he accepted Mrs. Metcalfe's concern but felt the Council did not have the expertise nor time to undertake an investigation into the comparative virtues of different types of trees or to evaluate the compatibility of different kinds of trees for all of the streets where the trees will be planted. He suggested that the trees designated for the locations of which Mrs. Metcalfe spoke be held in abeyance until the Forestry Department could meet with her, and that the rest of the trees be approved for planting. Mrs. Metcalfe said she understood Mr. Levy was trying to expedite this matter, but she strongly disagreed. She said she had done a number of spot checks and found the same problem. She concurred that the Council could not possibly evaluate every tree and location on the list, nor did she want the Forester to justify every place- ment; she wished to know if the general goals and planning of the Forester were com- patible with the philosophy of not putting small, compact trees in spots where there was a history of large, overhanging trees. She felt there was a broad prob- lem which needed to be addressed. Mr. Lieberman pointed out that on the list of trees and planting locations, about 90 were designated as simply "trees" with no mention of the species. He noted it would be difficult for the Council to evaluate this matter if the type of tree was not known. Mr. Ollendorff said the administration had, in response to Council's request last _ year, made a fairly detailed list of the number of trees to be purchased and their locations. For locations where the tree variety was not specified, he said he would get that information and circulate it to Council, and in addition, would find out the rationale behind the way the locations for specific types of trees were chosen. Responding to Mr. Schoomer, Mr. Ollendorff said adjacent property owners were not consulted when a decision was made to place a certain type of tree on the tree lawn. g ,