1985-05-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . Plan Commission Minutes - May 22, 1985 Page 4 B. The plan submitted by Trinity Delmar Redevelopment Corporation dated May 2, 1985 contains all items required by Ordinance No. 5085. C. The redevelopment plan is in the public interest. D. Public facilities will be adequate at the time the development project is completed. E. There are no zoning ordinance or zoning map changes needed, necessary or desirable for the redevelopment area. F. It is not necessary to acquire any real property in the area by eminent domain. G. The size of the area proposed will allow a practical and satisfactory development. H. The developer will include in its plan an appropriate equal opportunity and non-discrimination guideline. Mr. Washington seconded the motion which passed by a vote of 6-0. Ms Schuman moved that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the redevelopment plan for the Trinity/Delmar Redevelopment Area, 6900 Delmar, under Chapter 353 as submitted by the Trinity Delmar Redevelopment Corporation dated May 2, 1985. Mr. McCauley seconded the motion. After a brief discussion of the alternative parking plans, Mr. Rice moved that the motion be amended by adding a provision that the approved plan is to be consistent with the plan finally approved by the City Council under the application for the conditional use permit. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kennedy and passed by a vote of 6-0. The amended motion to approve the redevelopment plan was then voted upon and passed by a vote of 6-0. HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION OF SUTTER-MEYER HOUSE. 6826 CHAMBERLAIN The Plan Commission reviewed the application for the historic district designation for the Sutter-Meyer house, 6826 Chamberlain Court, submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission and dated May 8, 1985. In the discussion, members of the Plan Commission raised questions as to whether a building permit could be required for such activities as painting and indicated that the wording of the suggested regulations should be improved to provide greater clarity. Mr. Kennedy moved that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the application. Mr. McCauley asked Mr. Kennedy to consider modifying his motion to include the recommendation that the language of the proposed ordinance be improved. This was incorporated into the motion by Mr. Kennedy and seconded by Ms Schuman. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0.