1992-04-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . April 22, 1992 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 10 in accordance with the approved plan. 5. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations approved by the Fire Marshal. 6. Final driveway and parking lot layouts shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal to ensure there will be adequate access and maneuvering space for emergency vehicles. 7. The building shall be set back at least ten feet from the parking areas and driveway with walls containing patient room windows set back at least 15 feet from the parking areas and driveway, except bay windows shall be permitted to project no more than three feet into the required setback areas. 8. The total amount of the surface of the site covered by buildings, parking and driveways for Phases I and II shall not exceed 55 percent of the area of Lots 1 and 2 of One McKnight Place. 9. Outdoor off-street parking shall be provided on Lot 2 of One McKnight Place at the rate of at least one space for each five patients and one space for each two employees or staff members on the premises. 10. All parking and landscaping shall be installed per drawings for phases II & III and the Phase II area shall be seeded and maintained until development. 11. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan submitted for this Conditional Use amendment with the exception that the parking along Barby Lane shall be omitted. 12. Loading areas shall be reviewed for the entire project and shall meet the requirements of ~34-50.5 of the Zoning Code. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kendall and passed by a vote of 4 - 0, with two abstentions. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT: CONTINUATION OF APPLICATION FOR THE DESIGNATION OF THE PARKVIEW HISTORIC DISTRICT. Chairperson Kreishman informed those present that the Historic Preservation Commission has submitted for Plan Commission and City Council approval an application for the designation of the Parkview Historic District. Judy Little, member of the HPC and Parkview resident, presented the application. Ms. Little reviewed the proposed text amendments as re-submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission (hereafter "HPC"). Mr. Safe stated that he was opposed to the designation as submitted because he feels that the regulations are a violation of the property owners' right to do with their property as they wish. Ms. Ratner stated that City enforcement of the regulations as submitted will be overburden some on City staff and it will be too intrusive into the lives of the property owners. Ms. Little replied that enforcement would be the function of the HPC. The designation would increase property values and will be a contribution to Parkview residents and the City. Ms. Ratner agreed that the designation would be a positive event, however, as submitted, the designation covers too m-4-22.plc