My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-09-23
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
1992-09-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2005 1:00:27 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:03:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
8/26/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />September 23,1992 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 5 <br /> <br />Therefore, under current ordinances, pickup trucks may be parked only where recreational <br />vehicles may be parked, as follows: In a fully enclosed garage or when in compliance with all <br />of the following: <br />1. Height limited to 6-1/2 feet <br />2. Located behind the rear line of the building (unless in a carport or garage) <br />3. Screened from view at normal eye level from any street or from adjoining lots <br />4. Does not encroach on required off-street parking <br />5. Area limited to 250 square feet <br />6. Black top or concrete paved surface required for motor vehicles <br /> <br />The new proposed definitions would allow pickup trucks to be parked as regular "private <br />passenger vehicles." However, trucks (as well as all private passenger vehicles) would be <br />limited to those which do not exceed six and one-half feet (6-1/2 feet) in height, are not larger <br />than six thousand pounds (6000 lbs.) gross vehicle weight, contain no self-contained camping <br />unit and have no more than two wheels per axle. <br /> <br />Mr. Hill stated, that at the last meeting someone had stated that enforcement of the ordinance, <br />as written, would only affect about twenty (20) homes in University City. Mr. Hill stated that <br />the comment was erroneous. In only one inspection sweep of less than a one square mile area, <br />that took less than forty-five (45) minutes, he tallied thirty (30) homes with trucks and no <br />garages in which to park them, that would be affected by enforcement of the ordinance as it is <br />now written. <br /> <br />Mr. Kendall stated that most of those people were probably renters, as compared to <br />homeowners, and probably used the vehicles for their employment. Ms. Ratner stated that those <br />homeowners could still apply for variances. Mr. Safe stated that if somebody owns a pickup <br />truck, they should be able to park it on their own property. Mr. Foxworth questioned the cut- <br />off point of 6000 lbs, stating it sounded like a very large truck. <br /> <br />Joe Myers, 7052 Cabanne Court, stated that he opposed the amendment because it opens the <br />door to "any type of parking." Mr. Hill repeated that the amendment would only permit trucks <br />which do not exceed six and one-half feet (6-1/2 feet) in height, are not larger than six thousand <br />pounds (6000 lbs.) gross vehicle weight, contain no self-contained camping unit and have no <br />more than two wheels per axle. <br /> <br />June Goldman, 1215 Mt. Olive, stated that she is disabled and requires a small truck/van to <br />transport a three-wheeled scooter. She can only park the truck in the driveway on the side of <br />her house. She personally knows of about fifteen (15) other people that own little trucks and <br />are also in violation of the zoning code as it is. She feels that parking her truck in her driveway <br />does not hurt anybody. <br /> <br />m-9-23.plc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.