2002-06-26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

June 26, 2002, Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 spoke against the proposal. Jim Kaiser, 5571 Heintz spoke in favor of the proposal and state dthat he is Mr. McCabe’s broker. No other members of the public wished to speak and the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Credit moved that the vote on the matter be postponed until the following meeting in July to give th eapplicant time to work with the citizens to come to a compromise on some of the outstanding issues. The motion was seconded by Ms. Borg and passed by a vote of 4 to 0 with all members voting “aye.” Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit, Automotive Repair Facility, 6779 Olive Chairperson Credit announced that a public hearing was scheduled to hear an application from Arthur Reynold, 5734 Chamberlain to open an automotive repair facility at 6779 Olive. The Chairperson noted the Commission's procedures and criteria for reviewing conditional use permits and amendments to them. The Chairperson specifically stated that the Plan Commission must consider whether the use: a) Complies with all applicable provisions of the University City Zoning Code; b) At the specific location will contribute to and promote the community welfare or convenience; c) Will not cause substantial injury to the value of neighboring property; d) Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood development plan (if applicable), and any other official planning and development policies of the City; and e) Will provide off-street parking and loading areas in accordance with the standards contained in Article 7 of the University City Zoning Code. Mr. Arthur Reynolds spoke on behalf of the applicant and gave an overview of the proposal. He stated that the applicants agree to the conditions set forth in the Staff Report. Mr. Hill gave the staff recommendation that the application be approved per the June 20, 2002 Staff Report. The Chairperson asked for comments from the members of the Public. Paul reynolds 6763 Chamberlain and Sylvia Wedepohl, 6771 Olive spoke in favor of the proposal. No other members of the public wished to speak and the Public Hearing was closed. The Plan Commission determined that the evidence presented to the Plan Commission does support the conclusion that the proposed conditional use amendment: a) Complies with all applicable provisions of the University City Zoning Code; b) At the specific location will contribute to and promote the community welfare or convenience; c) Will not cause substantial injury to the value of neighboring property; d) Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood development plan (if applicable), and any other official planning and development policies of the City; and e) Will provide off-street parking and loading areas in accordance with the standards contained in Article 7 of the University City Zoning Code. Ms. Arbogast moved that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment with the following conditions: K:\WPOFFICE\WPDATA\m-6-26-2002.plc.wpd