Laserfiche WebLink
Session 12059 Minutes <br />December 180 1978 Page 6 <br />Councilman Metcalfe asked why controls were necessary on abutting property, <br />and Mr. Weinberg answered that abutting land or buildings often have real <br />visual and spatial impact upon historic features or districts. Mrs. Metcalfe <br />asked for examples of neighborhoods or other areas which might qualify as an <br />historic district, and Mr. Weinberg said City Hall. Mr. Lindenbusch added <br />University Heights #1, the part of Parkview within University City and possi- <br />bly University Hills. <br />In response to a question from Councilman Metcalfe, Mr. Weinberg replied that <br />the City Council would only be involved in questions of demolition. The Council <br />would, however, approve each designation of an historic district under its <br />normal powers of reviewing proposed zoning changes. The Board of Adjustment <br />would be the body involved in any appeal process for building permit contro- <br />versies. <br />Councilman Adams asked if the provisions in this ordinance applied only to <br />exterior work, and was told by Mr. Weinberg that it did. In response to <br />another question, it was ascertained that the word "abutting" applied only to <br />the lot actually abutting the historic district. <br />Councilman Sabol commented for the record that Miss Lsnahan had asked him to <br />do whatever he could to see that University Heights #1 was placed on the City <br />register of historical places, and that University Heights Association and <br />University Heights Garden Club were supporting this effort. <br />Councilman Metcalfe asked Al Goldman, Director of Planning, for his assessment <br />of the added administrative burden this bill will engender, and he replied that <br />there certainly would be some, but at this point could not say until a set of <br />application rules were developed by the commission and the standards for review <br />set. <br />Councilman Lieberman asked Mr. Goldman how he felt about the so-called Commis- <br />sion of experts, and he said he felt very comfortable with this concept. <br />Councilman Adams asked Mr. Goldman if he thought there would be an increase <br />in the cost of building permits in this area, and he replied that he felt that <br />all building permits should pay their own way in terms of administrative costs <br />and he would ask the Council to approve a rate schedule so the City could be <br />fairly compensated for the administrative cost. <br />Councilman Metcalfe asked about the flexibility in the ordinance, as in the <br />example of relocating an historic house or building, and Mr. Goldman felt <br />there was a great deal of flexibility. <br />Councilman Glickert asked Mr. Goldman how this ordinance would have affected <br />the renovation of the house at Delmar and Big Bend, Mr. Goldman said that if <br />he had been drafting standards for the committee, he would have drafted them <br />so that the building would look more nearly like it did originally, although <br />he does feel that the way the building looks now is not disruptive of the <br />general character of the neighborhood. What the bill would actually do depends <br />on whether the building is designated as an historic feature or if it is part <br />of an historic district - the standards drawn would be different for each. <br />