Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />CITIZEN COMMENTS: <br />Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel <br />Ms. Glickert first welcomed Ms. Ricci to the Council. Ms. Glickert felt that this bill had too <br />many restrictions and requirements where additional study would be needed. She felt that <br />the one thing that did need to be addressed immediately was hazardous trees but the rest <br />of the bill needed to move more slowly. Ms. Glickert questioned what was an arborist and <br />what qualification did this title include. She stressed that contrary to the proposal some <br />trees needed to be topped. She urged the Council to move slowly with its adoption of a <br />revised tree ordinance. <br /> <br />Kay Drey, 515 West Point Ave <br />Ms. Drey was present to support the bill. She said University City residents are proud of <br />their rich canopy of trees. Ms. Drey felt this bill was necessary to protect the longevity of <br />our City’s beautiful tree line. She remains committed to preserving University City’s <br />environment. <br /> <br />Saundra Lowes, 7425 Teasdale <br />Ms. Lowes was in favor of the bill but was opposed to any new development coming in and <br />tearing down all the trees and putting large homes on the lot. She also thought the bill <br />gave the City too much authority, especially in residents’ backyards. Ms. Lowes was also <br />concerned about the cost to a home owner for trimming a large older Oak tree that might <br />become entangled with the power lines in her backyard. She would like the Council to <br />rewrite the bill with fewer requirements for the homeowner and more on new <br />developments. <br /> <br />Wayne Munkel, 7543 Gannon <br />Mr. Munkel was opposed to limiting what a homeowner could do to private trees on his <br />property. He felt he was well experienced and could perform many of the trimming jobs <br />without being forced to get a permit and hire a professional. He wanted a clause added <br />stating that a homeowner experienced with tree trimming could do his own trimming <br />without being assessed fines. <br /> <br />Jane Schaffer, 501 West Drive <br />Ms. Schaffer thanked the City for the great job they did in cleaning up the limbs and debris <br />after the recent storm. She would like to know if Ameren UE would have to abide by this <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Skip Kincaid,1609 Missouri Ave, Lafayette <br />Mr. Kincaid worked for SKA Forestry and was a consultant on drafting this bill. He felt <br />University City had done an exceptional job so far in managing the many trees in the City. <br />He felt that there should be some control of the private trees to prevent topping in order to <br />maintain the character of University City. He said that it has been his experience that a bill <br />as this does not discourage new development. Mr. Kincaid explained what qualifies a <br />person to be titled an arborist. They had to pass a test with 100 questions, have three <br />years of experience and needed continuing education to be recertified. He praised the <br />proposed bill’s giving the City Forester the legal right to trim or cut down hazardous City <br />trees. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />