My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-05-06
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
1996
>
1996-05-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:47:48 PM
Creation date
7/20/1999 7:02:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
5/6/1996
SESSIONNUM
1664
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Session 1664, Minutes <br />May 6, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />1996-97 budget which takes effect July 1. A second public heating will be held at the May 20 meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams opened the public heating at 7:38 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman noted that University City Residential Service had submitted its annual budget request. <br /> <br />There were no other requests to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:39 p.m. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN FOR 7400 OLIVE APARTMENT PROJECT <br /> <br />The City Manager said neighbors were advised that the proposal for an apartment project at 7400 Olive <br />would be on the agenda. The applicant plans to submit a revised proposal for the eight-building, 32 <br />apartment complex to comply with staff comments regarding density and side yard treatment, which he <br />says will be ready for the May 20 meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. and commented that he felt the applicant should <br />have been present to hear residents' comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Rudolph Oppenheim, 7561 Drexel, president of Ohave Sholom Cemetery on the property at 7400 <br />Olive, commented on a newspaper article citing a clash between the builders and the cemetery. He said <br />the developers were fine people, but his main concern was preserving the sanctity of the cemetery, which <br />holds the remains of Holocaust victims. He understood the current plan would surround the cemetery <br />with buildings; he also wondered what the buildings might look like in 15 or 20 years. He felt that <br />putting up a fence would merely be a challenge to children or teenagers. <br /> <br />Ms. Brenda Walker, 7405 Anrose Drive, whose home abuts this property, said the only change in the <br />plans of which she was aware was that the developers said they would put up a privacy fence. She felt <br />there were still many issues that needed resolution, the main one being density--there could be more than <br />100 residents in this small area. Other concerns were excessive noise, lack of adequate parking, only <br />two dumpsters, and light from the complex shining in neighbors' windows. Ms. Walker was also <br />concerned that ifHUD money is used, the apartments may be rented to welfare recipients who will not <br />take care of them. <br /> <br />Ms. Linda Locke, 7340 Melrose, president of Musick Neighborhood Association, said the proposed <br />apartments were very close to this neighborhood, and she too was concerned about density. She felt her <br />neighborhood wants to see a different kind of development there, and it wishes to go on record as being <br />opposed to the plan. Mr. Wagner asked if most of the neighbors felt that way; Ms. Locke said no poll <br />was taken because it was not known exactly what is proposed for this property but they would oppose <br />anything that increases congestion. <br /> <br />Mrs. Thompson asked if the developer had met with residents since the plan was revised. Mr. Ollendorff <br />said Mr. Aboussie called last week because he wanted more time to revise his plan so as to meet staff <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.