My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-11-06 Regular
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-11-06 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 4:17:01 PM
Creation date
11/27/2006 2:16:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
11/6/2006
SESSIONNUM
2019
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Ricci moved that the current fee structure for programs for the next season <br />remain the same and that the printing of the new booklet go forward clearly marked <br />with an asterisk or some designation indicating that the fees of the current program <br />are subject to an increase of up to five percent within a period of 60 days of <br />introduction. Ms. Feier wanted to clarify what was meant by 60 days as long as <br />Council understood that this was for the spring program. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe was not comfortable with printing that the price could be subject to <br />change. Ms. Brot agreed with Mr. Sharpe, Jr., to have another meeting with Ms. <br />MacCartney and Council members. She would like the Parks’ Commission <br />members be invited also. Mayor Adams said that it has always been a policy that <br />fees reflect the cost of said programs. <br /> <br />Ms. Ricci moved to postpone to a later date. She felt that Council should have been <br />advised at the study session that the fee structure would be presented for a vote at <br />the next Council session. Ms. Ricci felt she needed time to study it so she can <br />address the fee structure with her constituents. Mr. Glickert seconded the motion <br />and was unanimously agreed to postpone to a later date. <br /> <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />Public Hearing was opened at 7:55 p.m. <br />1. Bills 8911 and 8912 relating to the parking of trucks and displaying a for sale <br />sign inside a vehicle. <br /> <br />Mr. Price noted that he is primarily concerned about a warning be given first <br />before being given a ticket. <br /> <br />CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Rosalyn Borg, 7820 Cornell Ave. <br />Ms. Borg was present to speak on retaining the present ordinance to restrict <br />street parking for trucks. She sited examples of why she felt it important not to <br />allow trucks to park on U-City streets. <br /> <br />Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel <br />Ms. Glickert said that Councils dealing with the truck issue has been consistently <br />addressed. She felt that at present there was a good compromise requiring that <br />if a resident does not have a driveway, they would need to purchase a permit <br />and would then be able to park their truck on the street. Ms. Glickert said the <br />Council needs to consider how parking of trucks on city streets would impact <br />neighborhoods, city streetscape, and property values. <br /> <br />Anne Marie Kiddon, 7348 Wellington Ave. <br />Ms. Kiddon requested the ordinance be kept as it is; otherwise there would be <br />more clutter from trucks parking on the street and also the proposed change <br />would invite large trucks also to park on the residential street. Ms. Kiddon <br />asked, were not new residents given a booklet explaining parking rules. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.