Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1699, Minutes <br />June 23, 1997 <br /> <br />should take a very strong position for Metrolink in University City. He mentioned that there was an article in the Post <br />Dispatch last week that characterized University City as being opposed to MetroUnk, in terms of its route and construction <br />phases. He hopes that this resolution helps clears up the confusion. <br /> <br />Mr. Arlen Jolly, 7550 Delmar, said that nineteen years ago he moved to University City when East-West Gateway was ~irst <br />talking about various rail plans, which included the Spine Une - downtown St. Louis through to Clayton. Due to his interest <br />in transit, he knows property values will appreciate near a modern rail line. That was his basis for moving to this community. <br />He strongly urges City Council to adopt this North of the Park resolution, as it may expedite the decisions of East-West <br />Gateway and whomever else has to make decisions. It has been approximately three years since Proposition M passed, and <br />the layperson does not understand the long procedures that must take place or the studies that must be made. Possibly, <br />especially in light of a ballot asking for more money, these people would be appeased with some concrete plans, in order to <br />feel like they accomplished something with their vote. <br /> <br />Mr. Andy Sisk, 5660 Kingsbury, said that he was not a University City resident, but he wished to commend University City <br />on the common sense of adopting this resolution. He thinks that University City is playing a leadership role, as the choices <br />go back and forth between routes. He went on to say that there were several good reasons why it was good for University <br />City to state a position and hold the line. It is more tiscally responsible to build as much as possible; operationally efficient - <br />zipping right to Forest Park, instead of zigzagging around; it is environmentally compatible; positive impact on the City's <br />businesses, and urban policy, in which University City has proven its leadership ability - making neighborhoods and <br />community work. The northern route would work well for everyday people with jobs, versus the sporadic use for people <br />utilizing it for entertainment or educational purposes. <br /> <br />Mrs. Thompson asked Mr. Edwards about the number of signatures his organization, Neighbors for MetroUnk, received. <br />She was very surprised so many residents were supportive of MetroUnk now, when many years ago when MetroLink was <br />discussed, a large number of citizens were very much opposed to it. She said that she was the only Councilmember that <br />agreed with and supported MetroLink coming to University City back then. Mr. Edwards responded that he believed that <br />the people were not aware of the need of mass transit back then as they are now. The roads were not as crowded as they <br />are today. There are probably many factors in this change of heart. He believes since MetroLink has been built and used, <br />the va~ue of it as a good form of transportation has increased dramatically, Mrs. Thompson asked if these people were not <br />afraid of losing their homes. Mr. Edwards explained to Mrs. Thompson that this route would not take any homes. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoomer moved approval of the resolution. Mrs. Thompson seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner wanted to recognize and commend the Neighbors for MetroUnk. This group had invested a lot of hard work <br />gathering and disseminating clear opinion data. One added provision that he was happy to see, was number seven, in the <br />resolution dealing with pedestrian overpasses and/or underpasses at existing pedestrian crossing points. He believes this is a <br />good addition to the Council's previous statements. <br /> <br />The motion to approve the resolution carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams commented that this resolution is just one more step and we would have to wait and see where it would go. <br /> <br />PROCI AMATION - NATIONAL BELL RINGING DAY -JULY 4, 1997: <br /> <br />Mayor Adams declared Friday, July 4th, 1997 as National Bell Ringing Day, which celebrates the tolling of the Liberty Bell at <br />Independence Hall, Philadelphia, Pa., at 2:00 p.m., which proclaims the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Mayor <br />Adams encouraged all citizens, business owners and community leaders to participate by ringing bells at 2:00 p.m. or to fly <br />the American Flag in observance of this day. <br /> <br /> <br />