11/20/95 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1655, ~ Page 5 November20, 1995 employees do not work at the same time, and many use public transportation. She felt sc~e of the parking problems may have arisen when the building w-us ~eing renovated and workmen's cars w~re parked nearby. She said the owner Mr. COtton, Ms. Allemsworth said she was not aware of the a~ cited by Ms. ~-c~bly, except that Mr. Ollendorff mentioned the salon was not to exceed a certain number of employees. Respo~l~ to Mr. Octton, Ms. T£~ly said it Plannin~ De~ that, ex~ for the hair salon, the rest of the buildin~ would be offioe use; also, the activities of the hair salon were listed, ar~ m~.~ge therapy w~s not mentioned. On a weekday visit, she found there was a parkir~ problem. Mr. Cottc~ asked for a definition of offJoe spaoe. Mr. A1 Goldman, Director of Planning, said the hair salon was the first busi- ness to apply for oocupancy in the renovated building, but tb~ Zoning Admin- istrator realized that if another such use went in or salon uses expanded, to allc~ more retail servioes or sales and to limit the rest of tb~ building to office use. ~ to Mr. Cotton, Mr. Goldman said the agreement was not in writing, and it was a tenant, not the owner, who was trying to expand services. Mr. Cotton said he did not see much difference between dentist of- Mr. Schocm~r said the parking pzuble~s at this location are too great to al- lc~ expanded uses, and he moved d~_nial. Mrs. Schuman seconded the motion. Mrs. Thcm~son said she visited the salon and fcund it a worthy addition to the c~,,L~nity. Mayor Pro Tern AddAms said no one is objecting to tb~ salon; it is simply a matter of whether this use will make the park/rig situation worse. He said he has received calls frc~ nearby residents concerned about parking, noting some attended the Council meeting on October 23rd. All votedAye for denial exceptMrs. Thompson, who votedNay. SITE PLAN - ~I~'~A_TR S~OP. 7725 OLIVE The Deputy City Manager said the non-profitMiriam Foundation applied to op- erate a retail/resale sb~p at 7725 Olive. Although the propertywill be re- moved fk-~ the tax rolls, the proposed use meets all City ordinances. Ap- p~valwas reomm~ndedwitht]~e following conditions: 1. All signs should be in strict compliance with tb~ University City Sign COde. 2. No mer=hand/se should be sold or displayed out of doors. 3. The store front shculd be remodeled to provide windows that are adequate to provide police surveillance of the interior or private security forces should be e~.nloyed at all times the store is occupied. In response to ~rs. Schuman, Ms. ~k-~-~ly said the property was owned by University City Children's Center. Mrs. Schuman noted that the current Miri- am Shop has cutdoor sales, and she did not want that to happen at the Olive location.