My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-07-25
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
2012-07-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2012 3:05:48 PM
Creation date
12/7/2012 3:05:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />was high enough, students would look for a way around parking there and park in the <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Ms. Moran stated that was a good question and added that she lives adjacent to Washington <br />University students; if Ames Place Subdivision towed their car three times, they were still ahead <br />as opposed to paying for parking. <br /> <br />Ms. Lewis asked why there was not statistics about parking from other communities with so <br />many communities in St. Louis. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that for crime statistics, staff was still in the process of collecting data. Staff had <br />been looking at the Central West End and Clayton, but it seemed that nobody had details about <br />fee vs. non-fee lots. He stated that other areas would have to be researched. Even in national <br />added that an additional traffic study was to be done and it would help in terms of our local <br />situation. Mr. Lai stated that for inner-ring suburbs, cost was expensive which would result in <br />greater incentive to build a parking garage because land is expensive. He stated that in West <br />County, land was cheaper for a developer to provide surface parking; for example, Chesterfield <br />Mall has some covered parking, but not much. He added that structured parking was often the <br />solution to that problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Senturia asked if staff had pursued items discussed last time such as the Queeny Tower <br />Parking Garage and parking around the stadium. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that buildings were being proposed to take away parking for that area and it was <br />more of a campus situation where there would be more security like in a corporate campus. <br /> <br />Mr. Senturia stated that there could be parallels regarding security, perhaps security data from <br />the hospital. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that the garage is partially underground and for the little surface parking they had <br />it might not be a good reference. <br /> <br />Mr. Senturia stated he was not talking about a comparison, but in terms of security, was <br />wondering if they had security problems underground. <br /> <br />Ms. Locke stated that the question was more about what was more secure, structured or surface <br />parking. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that staff was still conducting research. He stated that, for an example, for <br />downtown private parking lots, someone who has had 40 years of experience managing them <br />told us that crime is often a perception. <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti stated that the goal was not to provide anecdotal information, but statistics. <br /> <br />Ms. Lewis stated that it seemed like the City wants to find a different method to make additional <br />revenue and if that was the case, the public would be smart enough to say what they would be <br />tm; E <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.