My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/24/00
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000
>
07/24/00
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:48:46 PM
Creation date
8/15/2000 5:30:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
7/24/2000
SESSIONNUM
1789
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Session 1789 <br />July 24, 2000 <br /> <br />Mr. Munkel stated that the walkway was continuous from Olive to Bartruer, but there is a <br />barricaded street that goes from Bartruer south and stops at the barricade. It looks like that <br />there might have been a street all the way through. Will we be vacating the sidewalk or <br />the sidewalk and street. The petition states that the neighbors are asking for a barrier and <br />he wonders why we just can't put the barrier up and not vacate. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff stated that the policy is either that we have public property that is open to <br />the public, which the City maintains or we don't. We don't close public property, we <br />vacate it. Mr. Ollendorff said that the City would be willing to clean up this property and <br />put up a fence before vacating it. <br /> <br />Responding to Ms. Colquitt, Mr. Ollendorff stated that there was no meeting. There seems <br />to be another walkway closer to the corner of the home on Olive that tends to be causing <br />them problems. He has asked the police to keep an eye on the people walking on this <br />walkway. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe requested that legislation be prepared which would vacate this property. <br /> <br />Mr. Munkel is not opposed with the legislation, but he would like a clarification of who <br />owns the property here. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe said that he would take it upon himself to determine who the owners are and <br />get something in writing from them. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoomer stated that there is approximately four weeks until the legislation could be <br />enacted, so the Third Ward Councilmembers should canvass the neighborhood and see <br />what the most desirable solution to this problem would be. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner said that he is hearing from the neighbors that they want this walkway shut <br />down and they want no traffic through there. It sounds like that the City Manager can do <br />this, but it should be clear to the neighbors that once it is cleaned up and a barricade is <br />built, the City will no longer be responsible for maintaining it. <br /> <br />Responding to Mr. Munkel's questions about lighting, Mr. Ollendorff stated that one light <br />has been replaced on this property. The only interest being vacated is the City's. All utility <br />easements remain in place. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.