6605 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

customers, guests, or invitees, or other persons traveling in or about the City; (2) Whether existing towers are located within the geographic area necessary to meet the applicant's engineering requirements; (3) Whether existing towers, structures or buildings within the applicant's required geographic area are of sufficient height to meet system engineering requirements; (4) Whether all applicable Development Requirements per Subsection 2, below, have been met; (5) Whether the proposed facility can be co-located with other existing or proposed facilities (such as a tower or monopole). At least one of the following findings is required, along with a detailed explanation, if the applicant claims that co-location is not feasible: (a) Co-location would cause adverse aesthetic or environmental effects; (b) Co-location is not permitted by the existing facility's owner; (c). Fees, costs, or other contractual terms required by the owner(s) within the applicant's proposed service area would exceed the costs of a new facility; (d) Co-location would cause signal interference or otherwise impair the quality of service provided by an existing potential host facility or cause that facility go to off-line for a significant period of time, or (e) Other limiting conditions exist that would make co-location not feasible; (6) Whether existing towers or structures have sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's proposed telecommunications antennas; (7) Whether the applicant has submitted a statement that it will provide a surety bond, as per Subsection 2j below, that will cover the cost of dismantlement, emergency repairs, and, when necessary, removal of all structures and debris, and restoration of the site; (8) Whether the applicant has submitted a statement assuring proof of indemnification as per Subsection 2k below; (9) Whether the applicant has submitted a statement assuring proof of insurance as per Subsection 21 below; 5